makes you feel better.

You'd rather dismiss people who support Hillary than acknowledge them. Winning the primary, and insulting Hillary supporters, more important than winning the G.E. Interesting strategy.

It's too bad they had to be anonymous... I'm sure we'll hear more and more of this facinating campaign after the election is resolved and books start coming out.

the majority of women under 30 may not have voted for Clinton, but the majority of women under 65 certainly have.  

Obama 248
McCain 290

Hillary 290
McCain 248

Truth is that Obama is an almost sure loser in November and some of us are trying to stop the disaster before it happens.

Ah, when Hillary Clinton received an amazing 49% of the Hispanic vote in Illinois against IL's Rockstar without campaigning in the state I believe says it all.

When half of these hispanics living in IL voted for Clinton over the state superstar Obama ( even if she did not visit the state) while Obama won the white & black vote by a landslide says it all.

By the way, I am in Ohio.

Every morning new outlet had this group on the news. The actual press con had not only white,black, hispanic women but also white men.

All very angry registered democrats.

How did Hillary win key city wards?
BOSSES | Pledges for Obama fall short: Clinton, Alvarez 'were just very popular with Latinos and women'

Illinois Democratic Party leader Mike Madigan's 13th Ward on the Southwest Side went the same way. Aldermen Ed Burke (14th) and Dick Mell (33rd) both backed Obama and Allen, but voters in their wards did not.

"Clearly on the Southwest Side, the emerging force of the Latino vote -- [Clinton and Alvarez] were just very popular with Latinos and women," Burke said.

Both Burke's and Mell's wards are heavily Hispanic, and Obama has lower support among Latinos than from African-American or white voters, exit polls have shown.

Twenty years after the city voted along starkly racial lines in Mayor Harold Washington's first election, Obama surprised some skeptics by winning Northwest Side and Southwest Side white wards in his 2004 Democratic primary election against State Comptroller Dan Hynes and Maria Pappas -- among other white opponents.

But on Tuesday, most of those same white voters on the Northwest and Southwest Sides voted for Clinton over their own senator. The white lakefront wards went for Obama and for Larry Suffredin in the state's attorney race. African-American wards went for Obama and Ald. Howard Brookins in the state's attorney race.

Latino elected officials have long waited for Hispanics' voting strength to catch up with their share of the population. In a severely splintered race, they may finally have achieved it. Alvarez squeaked by with 26 percent of the vote in a crowded field.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/7 87281,CST-NWS-dems11.article

"There's only one qualification for becoming the Democratic nominee for the office of President of the United States of America:

1. Win the Democratic Primary by winning the most delegates."

So now that an inexperienced turnip has won the nomination (the miracle of marketing), you expect us to go along with it? Ignore us at your own peril, but we are not on board.

I think Clinton will work her butt off for Obama.
Secondly, I am sure that she will address this group strongly.

But with all that, Clinton is not Bradley of 2000 or Edwards of 2004.

Literally half of all americans who voted in the Democratic primary supporter her. But even bigger is, more registered democrats would have voted for her over Obama when this primary ends.

No matter who much Obama supporters would like to threaten her with her future in democratic politics, she literally & figuratively has a VERY LARGE BASE of Democrats supporting her.

This will not just disappear. Especially if Obama losses in November.

If Edwards was able to mount a run in '08 based on his '04 support, wait until Hillary does her thing if she wants to in 2012.

She will work her butt for Obama. But if Obama fails, no one can blame her for that.

Lets get that straight.

Exactly. That's why I think it's a GOP front. Any damage to Obama will be blamed on Clinton and will destroy whatever standing she has left.

"if this group actually undermines Obama in a significant way, Hillary Clinton's reputation and her future will be severely injured."

You totally don't get it at all, do you. Hillary Clinton is not to blame for Obama's lack of any qualifications for the office of the presidency, and many Democrats despise that the party has gone along with his candidacy. We aren't going to support someone we do not trust at all, especially after how he has won.I will never, ever support a candidate who's campaign has called me and my fellow Clinton supporters "racist" in order to snare the nomination. That has been obscene. Never will I support him, period.

its called democracy my friend.

They are democrats just like you & me.

They have a right to voice their opinions.

Ask Jesse Jackson & Al Sharpton. They are experts at this game.

Is it your position that Clinton could not get the liberal, the educated, the young, or the African-American vote in the GE? It has to be for you to be consistent you know. So I hope your answer is yes.

400 for 1 day.

A virtually unknown group that just launched. Website not even up yet.

I;m a business owner. Do you realize what 1,000, 3000, 5000 to start in 30 days will damage Obama?

He has enough problems connecting.

The worse anyone can do is dismiss this.

This is exactly how the signs of Reagan democrats started in the 80's.

With the internet today, this will even go faster.

This is serious.

"I take it you think this is a good thing?"

This is a wonderful thing, I signed up immediately for the group. It means people are fighting the horrible turn the Democratic Party has traken, throwing women under the bus, then expecting them to roll over an open their [wallets] for Obama. No in this lifetime!

Millions of White Reagan Democrats & Latinos is NOT you 4 year old baby.

Big difference

A brat cannot vote. A brat cannot deny the presidency.

Millions of these "bitter" & brown voters can.

They've done it before.

Maybe 4 weeks will be enough.

But there's one big difference. You don't need your 4-year old's vote, or even his approval. You run an authoritarian dictatorship in your home.

However, this country is a republican democracy and no presidential candidate has luxury of ignoring the demands of the voters, or sending them to a time-out.

American voters are adults and will do whatever they damn well please. Any candidate or political party that ignores this does so at their own peril.

When you lose big time in November you won't be smirking and tossing around demeaning comments any longer.

Ahhh! The clue and I missed it! Gop front group.